Abstract:
This research work is concerned on the preparation, characterization, analysis and
comparison of three types of compost, namely, (a) organic solid waste compost, (b) cocompost
of faecal sludge and organic solid waste and (c) vermicompost of faecal sludge and
organic solid waste ensuring SRDI (Soil Resource and Development Institute) standard. To
this purpose, solid waste was collected from the waste management plant established in the
campus of Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET), while the faecal sludge
was collected from the septic tank of the KUET campus. Dried faecal sludge and organic
solid waste were mixed at a ratio of 1:3 to prepare co-compost using passively aeration
method. For vermicompost, Eisenia fetida, earthworm species was used. A 56 days cycle of
composting period was considered for maturation.
During composting cycle moisture and temperature plays an important role. So, temperature
of different composts was monitored carefully in this period. The peak temperature of all
composts was obtained within 7-8 days. Highest temperature of the composts was recorded
as 51°C for organic solid waste compost, 47°C for co-compost, 38°C for faecal sludge
vermicompost and 40°C for solid waste vermicompost. After that temperature starts to
decrease and finally merged with the ambient temperature.
Initially all compost samples consists of 3.00 kgs of sample except faecal sludge and solid
waste co-compost. To maintain the 1:3 ratio of faecal sludge nad solid waste, 1 kg dry faecal
sludge was mixed with 3.00 kg solid waste sample. The mass reduction is greater for solid
waste than faecal sludge. In case of solid waste compost the mass reduction is about 70%
(70.26% for solid waste compost and 70.43 for solid waste vermicompost). Whereas the
mass reduction of faecal sludge vermicompost and faecal sludge-solid waste co-compost is
41.53% and 58.82% respectively. Loss of moisture cintent is above 80% for solid waste
compost, solid waste vermicompost and faecal sludge and faecal sludge solid waste
vermicompost. But in case of faecal sludge vermicompost moisture reduction is 61.12%.
Similar condition is observed for voletile solids. The fixed solid reduction percentage is
4.47%, 6.43%, 11.99% and 4.94% for solid waste compost, solid waste vermicompost,
faecal sludge vermicompost and faecal sludge solid waste co-compost.
Initially composts were slight acidic except the co-compost of faecal sludge and organic
solid waste (8.3). at final condition all prepared composts were a little alkaline (pH was
above 7). Moisture content, total organic carbon and TVS decreased during composting
process. A reverse scenario was observed in case of fixed solids and total kjeldhal nitrogen
content. C/N ratio is an important indication of compost quality and maturity. According to
SRDI, C/N ratio of a finely matured organic fertilizer should be within 20. In this experiment,
C/N ratio of different composts were found as 10.29 for solid waste compost, 10.08 for solid
waste vermicompost, 12.25 for faecal sludge vermicompost and 10.67 for co-compost of
faecal sludge and organic solid waste. So, the C/N ratio values were within the SRDI
recommended values. A remarkable progress was observed in case of pathogen destruction.
At maturation stage the number of faecal coliform decreased by 50 times with respect to the
initial condition. Phosphorus content of vermicompost (1.34% for solid awste vermicompost
and 1.22% for faecal sludge vermicompost) was higher than the organic solid waste compost
(0.86%) and co-compost (0.96%). Faecal sludge vermicompost was recorded to have higher
potassium content than solid waste compost (0.8%), solid waste vermicompost (0.75%) and
co-compost (0.76%). But according to SRDI standard the potassium content of organic
fertilizer should be within 1-3%. Therefore, only faecal sludge vermicompost satisfied the
SRDI standard value for total potassium content.
Description:
This thesis is submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering, November 2018.
Cataloged from PDF Version of Thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 53-59).